User Interface Choices

You know, software companies never cease to amaze me. Whether their products turn out mediocre or amazing, the decisions they make along the way almost always can be questioned. Pictured right, we have a good example of this.

For those of you not familiar, this is a shot of Apple’s Mail.app toolbar. It compares the original toolbar button design proposal to the final version. Guess which one is the proposal?If you don’t have Leopard already, you may think the left-most buttons are what was used in the final version of the OS. Unfortunately, you’d be wrong. Although it makes more sense for this style of button to be used, considering it’s metal appearance is very similar to the rest of the buttons in Leopard, Apple has an issue with consistency. As a result, they made it so all rounded buttons had a distinct look to the standard metallic buttons, and that look is shiny blue…aqua…thingy.

My point is, although Leopard uses a more consistent window style, which is a big improvement from Tiger and older versions of OS X, Apple is a company which will possibly be cursed with a knack of making inconsistent decisions on an almost constant basis.

Oh well?

February 23, 2008. Technology, flickr.

One Comment

  1. LazyBoy replied:

    Windows has good consistency with all its applications and programs and what not. Its those other people like… AOL who mess it all up and make use of an application skin of which that cannot be changed. Curse AOL. lol. Then there is Photoshop too, but the newer version don’t look like my old silvery one… if only I had the money to afford a new version. What I got works though. :-P

Leave a Reply

Trackback URI